Reporting
Upon completion of survey administration, and after a brief period for data cleaning and analysis, COACHE partners receive access to their results through our comprehensive digital Chief Academic Officer Report. Designed for senior academic administrators and faculty leaders, this report provides internal and external comparisons on actionable matters in an easy-to-navigate format. Additionally, partners receive a hard copy summary of our findings, and can elect to receive de-identified unit-level data for deeper analysis of their own faculty's responses.
Comparative Data for Deans
COACHE offers data tables that allow school or college leadership to gain insights into their faculty with the depth of tailored, contextual data for which COACHE is known.
Three levels of data are available depending on each school or college’s needs:
| Faculty Comparison Groups | Tier 3 - $1,500 ea. | Tier 2 - $3,000 ea. | Tier 1 - $5,000 ea. |
|---|---|---|---|
School/College faculty compared to the entire institution (internal comparisons only) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
School/College faculty compared to faculty at all similar schools/colleges at other universities |
Yes |
Yes |
|
School/College faculty compared to faculty at five similar schools/colleges hand-picked by you |
Yes |
*Costs are capped at $40,000 total per institution
Institutions can choose to receive reports for one or all of their schools/colleges and have the flexibility to receive a different tier of reporting for each. At the Tier 1 level, schools/colleges can choose their own peers, giving your deans deeper insight into their own faculty labor market.
Download the list of peer schools and colleges available for benchmarking.
To order Deans' Comparative Reports, email us at coache@gse.harvard.edu.
State System and Consortium Reports
Custom Reports
For an additional fee, COACHE can generate custom reports based on your needs. The base rate for a custom report request is $300 plus $300 per hour for analysis and report building. Custom reports requested by partners have included:
- Results by gender among faculty in STEM fields, as compared to non-STEM faculty, both within an institution and compared to peers
- A comparison of results among faculty who have participated in Teaching & Learning programs and those who have not
- A deep dive into intersectionality within an engineering school, considering gender, citizenship, and sub-discipline -- with comparisons to engineering faculty at peer institutions